On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:38 -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 21:25, Logan Tygart wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:11 -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 April 2006 20:42, Logan Tygart wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 20:22 -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 11 April 2006 19:47, Richard Morgan wrote:
> It's not entirely uncommon for legitimate mails to be flagged as spam by
> recipients, as these days anything you don't want is 'spam'. As such, being
> blacklisted when it's no fault of your own is entirely possible. I believe
> it even recently happened to slug@nks.net. But, your opinion is pretty
> clear.
RBL's do not flag email. I think you are confused. I use RBL's and I
have received all of my mail from nks.net. None of it was rejected.
> And that doesn't make your attitude any less elitist or condescending.
No, now, I'll be condescending: I don't think you know what you are
talking about. RBL's do not flag email. I've had enough of this
thread.
The Logan
-- It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy. --Groucho Marx Registered Linux User: 277727
----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:40:31 EDT