> But it does not say that everyone has lost interest in it. The problem is
> that everyone is used to everything being FREE and OPEN that now they are
> thinking communistic thoughts like Richard Stallman and feels every
> convieveable thing should be free and open.
>
> I dont care to call DRM, DRM but under it orginal name Content Protection
> Security. I say Content Proctection Security, and people dont seem to mind
> as much as saying DRM as the open source community has simply turned DRM
> into a dirty word.
> Personally we all know the artist does not get the money, and the cd sales
> etc goes in the pockets of the RIAA and the record label. But still stealing
> is stealing does not matter if you steal from Bill Gates House or some hobo
> on the street. One is not better than they other simply because one can
> afford it. While I am not happy or saying DRM is wonderful DRM is great.
> What I am saying DRM is a necessary evil.
Replied on slug-pol.
-- Tcsh: Now with higher FPS! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:46:29 EDT