On Thursday 17 August 2006 21:18, Ron Youvan wrote:
> > Avoid color lasers for photos. Inkjets are far better for that.
>
> Why? Have you seen the output of a photo quality laser printer?
>
> > You might consider a laser for most output, plus a low cost inkjet for
> > color. But if you don't print much, an inkjet alone may do the job.
It really is cheaper for low volume. Though I hate using it as it's many times
more expensive than toner and the price of high res color toner printers.
> I would think "thermal dye transfer" would be better than inkjet for
> color if "you don't print much." (as is the KODAK kiosk at Wally World)
What kind of pricing and resolution are we looking at now?
--Steve Szmidt
"To enjoy the right of political self-government, men must be capable of personal self-government - the virtue of self-control. A people without decency cannot be secure in its liberty. From the Declaration Principles ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:07:00 EDT