Re: [SLUG] Firewall

From: Pete S. (linux@myraandpete.net)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 17:35:33 EDT


steve szmidt wrote:

>On Friday 01 September 2006 13:35, Richard Smoot wrote:
>
>
>>My wife prefers Linux, but needs to reactivate her Win98 so she can
>>go to sites using Flash 9. It appears Flash 9 for Linux won't be ready
>>until early 2007.
>>Zonealarm has stopped supporting Win 98. What was the other
>>firewall you were recommending? She hasn't used her Win 98 for
>>over a year. I havn't checked AVG yet if it is still good for Win 98.
>>This Flash 9 issue could really hurt adoption of desktop Linux's.
>>She is finding a lot of sites she goes to require it.
>>
>>
>
>If you have any old machine you can turn that into a great firewall for all
>your computers. You configure it to be a cashing DNS too and browsing might
>be a bit faster, as it stores addresses.
>
>With OpenBSD you get a state of the art f/w and a secure time server. With
>48MB RAM, 500MB disk and 2 NICs you are running.
>
>There are even floppy versions of Linux that contains a f/w. A small CPU is
>good because you have less fan noise and power consumption. 486 and up is
>plenty.
>
>
>
Off the shelf router/firewall should work fine. I have worked with the
Coyote Linux floppy distro on a 486 with minimal ram (16 meg), no fan &
2 NICs (and some duct tape).
http://www.extremeoverclocking.com/articles/howto/Ghetto_Router_1.html

If you need something on the windows 98 box (software FW), Zone Alarm
was best. I have also used Black Ice Defender (though might have the
same issue with Windows 98)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:49:15 EDT