On Sunday 23 September 2007 20:28, logan wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 -0500, SOTL wrote:
> > We were discussing why Linux is not acceptable to the masses.
>
> <snip distro diatribe>
>
> > We could go rounds and rounds with similar stories but the point is that:
> >
> > Linux is NOT stable it keep changing on an hourely bases which is good
> > for development and horrible for production and the Linux distributions
> > that are desk top stable like Scientific Linux are missing important
> > functions required for networking.
>
> Heh, ironically, the thing most people complain about my favorite
> distro, is its lack of change. Try Debian Stable. It is exactly that.
> Stable. I have been using Debian Stable, and only Debian Stable, as my
> Desktop environment since 1998.
I did not post any comments concerning Debian because I do not have
enough !@#$%^& words in my vocabulary to describe the way I feel about that
distribution. If I wanted to play with computers, and I do mean play, and my
boss would give me a 5 year sabbatical I may consider it but I really think
not. Not after my last set of go arounds.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:20:16 EDT