Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility

• Next message: Mark: "Re: [SLUG] at-home cops, evading the"
• Previous message: Bill Ehlert: "Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility"
• In reply to: Bryan-TheBS-Smith: "Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility"
• Next in thread: Mike Manchester: "Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all:

(Thanks for the RPM explanation.)

> > Humor a dummy (Slackware user) here please, if you have
> > the gtz version of a program, why do you need to make it
> > into a RPM form?

> As the BSD guys say, "if it ain't source, you don't want it." ;-PPP

  Not here, if it isn't the source, (or a binary) I don't
know what to do with it.
(Slackware is `BSD like' in many respects, I am told.)
I `un-gz' and `un-tar' with mc. If the dependencies fail
I just delete the directory. (too common)

         73 (= Best Regards) de: (= this is) Ron ka4inm@qsl.net
       Please visit my HAM web site at: http://www.qsl.net/ka4inm

• Next message: Mark: "Re: [SLUG] at-home cops, evading the"
• Previous message: Bill Ehlert: "Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility"
• In reply to: Bryan-TheBS-Smith: "Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility"
• Next in thread: Mike Manchester: "Re: [SLUG] is there tar to rpm utility"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:05:28 EDT