Re: [SLUG] SCO controversy - but funny this time.

From: Ian C. Blenke (icblenke@nks.net)
Date: Tue Jun 03 2003 - 10:15:18 EDT


On Monday 02 June 2003 22:01, steve wrote:
> I've not visited his link so I don't know what is going on, but if
> he's not given authorization for you to login to his website you
> are actually in violation of federal law.

His website was down. He probably removed his index.html and the apache server
is setup not to do auto-indexing (which is wise).

I wouldn't worry about breaking any federal law. Even if you are personally
challenged with a login, there is nothing wrong with clicking cancel to avoid
attempting access to a given site.

> Since it came into effect I only do remote work once I've received
> written authorization.

Best practices generally suggest thorough CYA documentation.

In our litigious society today it's a wonder we get anything accomplished.

> Remember the law is blind and judges has to follow them within the
> scope they are given.

Letter of the law vs the spirit of the law. The eternal battle for justice.

-- 
- Ian C. Blenke <icblenke@nks.net>

(This message bound by the following: http://www.nks.net/email_disclaimer.html)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:11:43 EDT