Re: [SLUG] {SPAM?} The spam tag

From: Robert Snyder (robertsnyder@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 06:05:05 EDT


On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:59:02 -0400, Paul M Foster
<paulf@quillandmouse.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:45:25PM -0400, Robert Snyder wrote:
>
> > all my mails get the spam tag in the subject. First I thought it was
> > the whole threaded message thing. But is this verizon doing.?
> >
> > I wonder if this message will get the spam tag.... I did go to file
> > write new message so it should not get a spam tag because of the of a
> > threaded message issue.
>
> You've already heard the explanation about this. Ian and I had a
> discussion about this tonight. There are a couple of possible solutions,
> but I'm not sure in which direction we'll go. Probably the first option
> will be to have the SLUG membership list serve as a whitelist for NKS's
> spamassassin. The way things are architected, this is not necessarily a
> simple or great solution, but it is obvious. The ideal solution would be
> to have the mailing lists operate from the same domain as the website--
> suncoastlug.org. However, that means more work and some additional
> headaches.
>
> Paul

Oh hell I just got tired of it and started using Gmail account. I
like the interface and the way it list messages as conversations ....
Apparently gmail does not support the threaded headers as there
converstation grouping technology seems to be going by subject line I
guess.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:22:30 EDT