none of those state that microsoft will force users to install it whether they like it or not or that microsoft will administratively override that decision by installing it for them remotely.
it sounds to me like theyre referring to whether the service pack is downloaded automatically while connected to the internet. i have a feeling the "blocking mechanism" is nothing more than a registry entry that instructs automatic update to skip sp2 (checking this now). if automatic updates are turned off, then this isnt an issue. it just never happens.
chris lee <christopher.a.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: perthie
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 10:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [SLUG] OT: M$ deals the final blow
To: slug@nks.net
where is this article? i think it was posted before i joined earlier
in the week.
http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=2193
http://www.activewin.com/awin/comments.asp?HeadlineIndex=26108
http://bink.nu/?ArticleID=2514
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:25:20 EDT