Ken Elliott wrote:
>>>windows core code is the same as used in Windows 1.0.
>>>
>>>
>
>Not at all. NT 3.5 was all new code. Nothing from Windows 1.0 was in it.
>They started adding some Win32 stuff in W2k and XP for program
>compatibility. I like W2K, but really dislike XP.
>
>That being said, I'm really liking FC3 and Debian.
>
>Ken Elliott
>
>
Okay, as a matter of curiosity, what is the functional difference
between 2k & XP? I have to admit that I've thought of bringing the
butterfly back into my house for one machine, and I don't want to waste
money on XP if 2k will be a better choice. (Once again, Ken, sorry for
my little tantrum there.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:56:38 EDT