Re: [SLUG] another reason for linux - part two

From: Steve Szmidt (steve@szmidt.org)
Date: Sat Aug 14 2004 - 14:20:27 EDT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 12 August 2004 10:01 am, Steve Szmidt wrote:
> On Thursday 12 August 2004 06:52 am, Robert Foxworth wrote:
> > Another reason for linux ...
> >
> > Adding SP2 to a Windows XP install will disable
> > raw socket support. This breaks the functionality
> > of programs such as nmap-windows version
> > that use raw sockets. MS acknowledges that
> > this was done on purpose.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Which brings up an interesting question. How many here use XP, or anything
> past w2k SP 2?

Thank you all for your replies. They wil be tabbed and reported to the proper
authorities!

Kidding aside, the "interesting" part, was simply how pervasive is windows in
the Linux community. The ratio of using both.

The reason I went all Linux (except for games - w2k SP2) is that I did not
want to have to depend on MS in any way. The SP2 license on w2k, as many
already know, is when they changed the EULA to give them insight into YOUR
computer and the ability to put software into it without you being able to
stop them. (Some settings make it look like you can stop them but it does
not.)

To me it's a philosophical decision, and partly ethical. I don't want to flow
power to someone acting in a "criminal" way.

But I also have realized the purity of the Unix design, and it's far saner to
invest efforts into it. In other words I like investing into things that has
longevity. Something that I know has sound foundation to build on and does
not force me anywhere I don't want to go.

I'm fortunate to having moved myself into a situation where there's no reason
to use windows in any productive way. None.

True there are some tradeoffs, but they are very minor and I have workarounds.

So being that most of us, at least the ones with a couple of years on our
back, have lived through the windows "evolution" and depended on it. We all
realized that there had to be a better solution.

This brings it into the second interesting question.

How many here ONLY use or rely on Linux?

I.e. you can have it but only use it strictly for amusement, and would be none
the worse if it disappeared.
- --
Steve

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
                                Benjamin Franklin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBHlfwljK16xgETzkRAoNvAJ9nZdObpX19+M/Byj/hHMp4wzidKgCgj15L
JOZ3nMyHuz0VLMZRKC5lfpA=
=wLCh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 14:41:22 EDT